Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Guessing Gender Based on Web History
Using your browser URL history to estimate gender
...though it pegged me with an 83% likelihood of being female based on this history list:
Site - Male/Female Ratio
google.com - 0.98
myspace.com - 0.74
youtube.com - 1
wikipedia.org - 1.08
amazon.com - 0.9
facebook.com - 0.83
blogger.com - 1.06
flickr.com - 1.15
mlb.com - 1.33
time.com - 1.44
wamu.com - 0.85
snopes.com - 0.74
americanexpress.com - 0.98
linkedin.com - 0.94
amtrak.com - 0.75
godaddy.com - 1.17
metropcs.com - 0.77
lulu.com - 0.96
spinner.com - 0.8
abc.com - 0.47
Monday, July 28, 2008
Crowd Wisdom or Angry Mob?
Interesting article about how "The Dark Knight" became the #1 all time movie on IMDB - passing "The Godfather" in their rankings for the first time in 10 years.
People aren't just giving perfect ratings to Batman; they are intentionally tanking The Godfather's rating too...
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Are Google Maps good or evil?
Thought provoking, albeit a bit sensationalistic. All new technology can have its evil uses, though generally speaking the pros outweigh the cons in the end.
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Should I Stay or Should I Tow?
Sunday, July 13, 2008
Death to Voicemail
Think Before You Voicemail
"Voicemail is dead. Please tell everyone so they’ll stop using it."
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
Friday, June 27, 2008
Quote of the Day
"Surely this will be nothing more than very, very irritating for people who want to use the internet?"
Thursday, June 26, 2008
I...am totally...BLIND!!!
Visions of future technology don't involve being chained to a desktop machine. People move from home computers to work computers to mobile devices; public kiosks pop up in libraries, schools and hotels; and people increasingly store everything from e-mail to spreadsheets on the Web.
But for the roughly 10 million people in the United States who are blind or visually impaired, using a computer has, so far, required special screen-reading software typically installed only on their own machines.
New software, called WebAnywhere, launched today lets blind and visually impaired people surf the Web on the go. The tool developed at the University of Washington turns screen-reading into an Internet service that reads aloud Web text on any computer with speakers or headphone connections.
"This is for situations where someone who's blind can't use their own computer but still wants access to the Internet. At a museum, at a library, at a public kiosk, at a friend's house, at the airport," said Richard Ladner, a UW professor of computer science and engineering. The free program and both audio and video demonstrations are at http://webanywhere.cs.washington.edu.
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Internet Easter Eggs
10 awesome Internet Easter eggs
I'm actually wondering why I never tried entering the Konami code on a webpage, since I secretly do it on most DVDs...
And still nobody has found either of the two Timely Persuasion easter eggs, hint hint.
Friday, June 20, 2008
Sarcasm and Survival
It's also easy to imagine how sarcasm might be selected over time as evolutionarily crucial. Imagine two ancient humans running across the savannah with a hungry lion in pursuit. One guy says to the other, "Are we having fun yet?" and the other just looks blank and stops to figure out what in the world his pal meant by that remark. End of friendship, end of one guy's contribution to the future of the human gene pool.
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Dash Express GPS adds Twitter functionality
Checking In Outside The Box
Alaska Airlines' Airport of the Future makes quick work of getting passengers through check-in.
The results? During my two hours of observation in Seattle, an Alaska agent processed 46 passengers, while her counterpart at United managed just 22. United's agents lose precious time hauling bags and walking the length of the ticket counter to reach customers. Alaska agents stand at a station with belts on each side, assisting one passenger while a second traveler places luggage on the free belt. With just a slight turn, the agent can assist the next customer. "We considered having three belts," White says. "But then the agent has to take a step. That's wasted time."
Alaska, then, is likely to save almost $8 million a year on the Seattle terminal if it converts customers the way it has in Anchorage. The Seattle makeover cost $28 million, a far cry from a new $500 million terminal.
(via SvN)
Sunday, June 15, 2008
Dad's Day

For more:
SomeEcards: Father's Day
(indirectly discovered via CupKozy)
Friday, June 06, 2008
Google VP of Search Quality
At Google, a search guru's dream comes true
"I don't have to tell anybody around here that search is important. That's a very nice luxury to have,"
Thursday, May 29, 2008
iPhone Navigator?
Love the quote from the GPS president:
iPhone Nano, GPS Are More Important to Apple Than 3G: Analysis
I recently sat down with the president of a GPS navigation system manufacturer to ask him how he felt about the prospect of a GPS-enabled iPhone. "Scared [expletive]-less," he said.
Yet the iPhone has the potential to leverage true GPS functionality better than any other device. It already has a large, 3.5-in touchscreen interface, external speakers and an elegant Google Maps interface. All you'd need to add to a GPS-enabled iPhone is a suction-cup windshield bracket (sold separately, of course), and you'd have a fully-functional, pocket-portable car navigation device. People already pay hundreds of dollars in droves for this increasingly popular segment of devices, and the iPhone could essentially challenge an entire product category with one add-on feature.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Redefining Spoilers
As many of you know, I'm spoiler averse when it comes to TV shows. I don't even watch the "Next week on..." upcoming episode trailers as I feel they give too much away. I can't even count the number of times I've gone running from a room with my ears covered when a commercial for an upcoming episode appears during a sporting event.
This is especially true when it comes to Lost. The show is so deeply layered that part of the fun is putting the pieces together and speculating as to where they are going with it, but actually "knowing" is a whole different story. There was a big controversy last year when the plot twists of the season finale were revealed online prematurely, and it's starting up again with alleged spoilers of this season's finale starting to crop up online as well.
One of my favorite spoiler-free Lost sites recently entered the controversy. Lostpedia is a wiki dedicated exclusively to the characters, episodes, and situations of Lost. An absolutely brilliant idea to help people keep track of the overlaps and connections between characters. It wouldn't make sense to do this for a lot of shows, but with so many overlapping flashbacks, flashforwards, and parallel storylines the site becomes invaluable.
The admins of the site do an excellent job of setting spoiler free ground rules. The actual articles can only include factual accounts of episodes that have aired. Spoilers are relegated to separate "theory" and "discussion" tabs on the Wiki, keeping the articles themselves clean for anyone who wants to catch up and/or refresh their memory.
Of course, with any community driven wiki project the site is primarily self policed. There was a recent situation where one bad apple posted finale spoilers right in the middle of an unrelated article without warning, triggering a big debate on spoilers. I respect the right of a curious public to post and seek out spoilers to their favorite shows, but only if they are in their proper place. Warnings and hidden text ensure people know what they are getting into; an ambush in a site that is supposed to be "clean" is another thing altogether.
On the main page of Lostpedia, they also post Lost-related news articles. Updates on the writers strike, interviews with the cast and creators, a synopsis of the video game, etc. All well and good since the blurbs are pretty neutral and there is a clear warning if the outgoing link to the article may contain spoilers.
Which is why I was slightly annoyed at the most recent article posted to the main page:
(This ends my preamble, and I'm now moving on to the "What is a spoiler?" question promised above. Turn back now if you want to be kept completely pure.)
---
---
---
---
---
---
Matthew Fox keeps quiet on 'Lost' ending
Matthew Fox has claimed that he is the only actor on Lost to know how the show will end. Fox confirmed the news to the Daily Mirror and revealed that fellow cast members probe him for answers: "Yes, it’s true. They understand I can't talk about it, but sometimes they’ll ask, just hoping I’ll blurt it out."
As I said I truly appreciate the job the Lostpedia folks do in trying to keep a clean environment to the best of their ability. It's a fairly well known fact that the cast doesn't know how the show is going to end. So the reveal that one actor does know begs the question of "Why does he know?," which leads me to believe it must be important to the plot and how he's playing his character NOW to set up how it will end. And since Lost is starting to introduce time travel fairly heavily into the plot, I think I know where this is heading. Awesome, but less awesome than if I were surprised by it.
But is this defined as a "spoiler" by traditional definitions? Not really, but extending the umbrella to include "information not learned from the show itself" would place it in this category. Maybe it's just how my mind works. Technically I suppose the fact that I learned that nobody knows the ending paired with the correction that one actor does is what did me in. But in today's day and age you'd really need a full on media blackout to ensure a totally pure experience. And that would mean turning off the Internet :(
Hopefully I'm wrong and this will be little more than a red herring caused by my overactive synapses. But regardless, it's interesting how a show like Lost can redefine television and redefine the definition of "spoiler" at the same time.
PS: This post is loosely based on a ranty comment I submitted to the Lostpedia Blog shortly after reading the above linked article. The admins seem to have chosen not to publish my comment (probably wise of them in hindsight if what I'm guessing does prove to be spoiler-esque), but I felt it was a thought provoking enough situation to repurpose here.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Pilgrimage
While waiting for that, behold the accompanying two pictures, taken personally by me during side-pilgrimages of this trip. :)

Saturday, May 24, 2008
This sounds familiar...
n. The act of using a regular cell phone to get information by calling someone who is sitting at a computer and can surf the internet by proxy.
"We are hopelessly lost. I'll just use my iPhone-a-friend and my mom can get us directions from Google Maps."
"When are you going to get a real iPhone, you cheap ass?"
via UrbanDictionary